Saturday, June 9, 2012

Testing for Intelligence: Tool or Target




Should young children’s development be measured or assessed?  Yes, if the measurement is for the purpose of showing progress over time and evaluating the program’s effectiveness in providing an environment that has afforded the child the opportunities needed for healthy development.  I have come to the understanding, through the study of child development that there is a common belief among theorists that children are born motivated to learn.  Piaget believed that infants are smart and active learners. (Berger, 2009, p. 161). Vygotsky believed a child is an apprentice in thinking. (Berger, 2009, p.253)  Berger highlighted Vygotsky’s theory emphasizing the role of adults in scaffolding children’s learning by providing support for skills that are emerging until the child has mastered the next developmental task.  Bronfenbrenner’s ecological model recognizes that the child is an active force, exerting an influence on the people around her and on the relationships she has with others (Keenan & Evans, 2009, p. 35).  
                The National Association for the Education of Young Children (2003) released a joint position statement with the National Association of Early Childhood Specialist in State Departments of Education:
Early childhood professionals…have a shared responsibility to…make ethical, appropriate, valid, and reliable assessment a central part of all early childhood programs. To assess young children’s strengths, progress, and needs, use assessment methods that are developmentally appropriate, culturally and linguistically responsive, tied to children’s daily activities, supported by professional development, inclusive of families, and connected to specific, beneficial purposes: (1)making sound decisions about teaching and learning, (2) identifying significant concerns that may require focused intervention for individual children, and (3) helping programs improve their educational and developmental interventions. (NAEYC & NAECS/SDE, 2003, 1)
Testing should be a tool for identifying the next developmental task and the enhancements needed in the child’s environment to accomplish progessive milestones.  It should put pressure on adults that have the resources and knowledge to adapt and when there are concerns educators must place the child as first and most important over the second concern, the disability. (Ray, Pewitt-Kinder & George, 2009, p.21).  A holistic approach must consider the following questions:
                What genetic or environment conditions foster …. (healthy development)?
                What intervention is best … (for the child)?
                Which child-rearing practices and family structures….(contributed to the development being assessed)?
                What school, teacher and placement…..(will foster positive growth)?  (Berger, 2009, p.330)
Sir Ken Robinson challenges us to examine our education system … modeled on the interests of industrialism. We educate children by batches. If you are interested in the model of learning, you do not start with a production line mentality. (Robinson, 2010) He goes on to say that the important characteristics that children have in common is not date of birth. A dynamic systems approach recognizes development is impacted by interactions that are multidirectional, multidisciplinary, multicontextual, and multicultural and exhibit plasticity. (Berger, 2009, p. 7-19) Children are motivated to learn when the student feels he belongs, believes he is valued, and is engaged in activities that are relevant and meaningful to him.  (Snow, 2012). A plethora of concepts have been presented during the study of early childhood requiring a multifaceted view of developmental expectations.
                UNICEF is engaged in interpreting international assessment data of learning achievement. Elaine Furniss’ statement in response to “Who wants to know and why?” is so clarifying, I felt impelled to share it. I believe this is a great question to post to a blog is entitled “Have I asked the right question?”.
So many people are interested to know the outcomes of learning. For each type of stakeholder, the question of concern may be different. Students want to know if they are learning, and if so, how well.  Assessment feedback for students should ensure that students know what they can do, and what they cannot…and how to correct their mistakes. Assessment tools such as rubrics and portfolio assessment, discussed below, provide such sources of information. Families and communities want to know if children are learning and how useful school is as a contribution to community life, especially if there are competing demands for children’s time and if schooling is an expensive commodity. Teachers want to know what students are learning, and schools want to know if teachers are doing a good job. Education systems want to know if student learning is consistent with curriculum standards, if schooling is efficient and if students are well prepared for the challenges of life. (Furniss, 2003, p.1)
In the Philippines UNICEF has been working with the government to create child-friendly learning environments. The school system has adopted policies to adjust to the differing needs of children. I am going to highlight practices that differ from a traditional United States public school. Children are not publicly ranked based on performance. Children are allowed to use their first language during the school day. The needs of children are considered first over the needs of others. No children are excluded from activities by peers. Children as active learners learn by doing and working cooperatively in pairs and in groups. (Furniss, 2003, p.12) In an interview with a teacher in the Philippines, UNICEF learned about the assessment practices.  The teacher used observation to determine learning goals for each child. Tests were given to help plan for small and large group curriculum needs in literacy tasks. During the school year the teacher collects both formal and informal samples of the children’s work to evaluate skills. Children are grouped together to work on skills development and formally evaluated based on all assessment quarterly.  New goals are set and new groups created based on developmental progress.  The students also prepare a self-evaluation to reflect on their own abilities.  Pascual explains, every new piece of information sets me to thinking about what help my students need and how I can best help them. (Pascual, 1999). 
Understanding the value of assessment to create relevant and meaningful curriculum and identifying the skills required of the teacher to observe student achievement reinforce development and learning.  To appreciate the individual differences in our children and the important influence of community, it is important to remember that nothing is entirely genetic or entirely environmental. Genes always interact with the environment. (Berger, 2009, p. 380) Janet Gonzales Mena provided us with six professional attributes that would help gather authentic observations.  I believe three are particularly applicable to assessing children. First, Gonzales Mena cautioned us to avoid making judgments or assumptions; secondly, we must pay attention to the feelings of the child, and last we need to determine how we are going to use the information. (Laureate Education, Inc., 2010).  Assessment should be a tool for planning next steps and not a target children are measured against.

References
Furniss, E., (2003). Assessing learning achievement. UNICEF, New York, NY. Retrieved from www.unicef.org/lifeskills/files/AssessingLearningAchievement.doc.
Keenan, T., & Evans, S. (2009). Theories of development. In An introduction to child development (pp. 35-43).
Laureate Education, Inc. (2010). (Produce).  How to observe children. [Web cast]. Baltimore, MD: Author
NAEYC & National Association of Early Childhood Specialists in State Departments of Education (NAEYC & NAECS/SDE). 2003. Joint position statement. Early childhood curriculum, assessment, and program evaluation:  Building an effective, accountable system in programs for children birth through age 8. Washington, DC: NAEYC
Pascual, M. J., (1999, April) (Interview with UNICEF) Active Assessment in the Philippines. Teachers Talking about Learning. Retrieved from www.unicef.org/teachers/forum/0199.htmRay, J. A., Pewitt-Kinder, J., & George, S. (2009, September). Partnering with families of children with special needs. YC Young Children. 64(5). 16-22.
Robinson, K. (2010). Changing education paradigms. RSAnimate.org. This animate was adapted from a talk given at the RSA by Sir Ken Robinson, world-renowned education and creativity expert and recipient of the RSA's Benjamin Franklin award. Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zDZFcDGpL4U
Snow, K. (2012, February 16). Relevant and meaningful. Revolutionary Common Sense by Kathie Snow, http://www.disabilityisnatural.com/. Retrieved from http://www.disabilityisnatural.com/newsletters/490-rele-mean

2 comments:

  1. I agree children should be assessed on their progress over time. I believe that children should be assessed according to their learning style.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hey Wendy,

    What age do you think is appropriate for a child to be assessed? Do you believe that over time what they are assessed on will help them with their future studies?

    ReplyDelete